01 1438 27 2017 - 10:19






British Council and EU Commission Ask ... 5544
Smaller firms may face pollution limits 4851
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 4687
Greens welcome EU ban on live export subsidies 4416
Green Party MEP for South-East England 4277
London's Green MEP Warns Long Hours May Cost Londons Workforce Its Health 4256
Cameron's organic overtures 'meaningless',says Green MEP 4167
Further privatisation of NHS not the answer 4113
Herculean effort needed to save Olympic sports 4103
The Tories are not for turning - Keith Taylor 4100



29/01/2012
The Asia Pacific Greens Network 03/10/2011
The African Greens Mourn the Death of Prof.Wangari Maathai 27/09/2011
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 15/09/2011
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 08/09/2011
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 27/08/2011
DEMOCRATIC GREEN PARTY OF RWANDA 13/07/2011
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 16/05/2011
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 05/05/2011
GREEN PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 27/03/2011


-> Greens Press -> Nuclear Waste: ..
23392006-08-01

Green Party in England & Wales

Nuclear Waste: 'Let's bury the bodies'

The Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM) has today
published its final recommendations for dealing with the UK's
radioactive waste - advocating burying it deep underground, after
decades of 'interim storage' to allow for intensified research to
address 'uncertainties.' (1)

Green Party Principal Speaker Keith Taylor commented: "The UK has
been creating radioactive waste for 50 years, and today's report
shows that we still don't know what to do with it. Quite simply, they
have decided out of sight, out of mind is the best option. The term
disposal is misleading - it would be more honest to talk about
disguising the problem through burying the bodies.

"Nuclear waste must be stored in above ground facilities to allow
easy access for when things go wrong - and to ensure close
monitoring. Burying toxic waste deep in the earth is not a
sustainable or predictable route to follow.

He also highlighted the impact the committees findings would have on
the government's enthusiasm for a new generation of nuclear power

"It is ludicrous to embark on a new round of nuclear power build
whilst we are still stumped with what to do with the present 47 000
tonnes of dangerous radioactive material our current nuclear power
stations will produce. How many 'host communities' will the
government need to buy off in the future - 'providing the community
with a package of measures to support participation' - to deal with
the ever increasing mountains of radioactive waste they plan to
create in the future?

"Presumably this is why the government were so careful to complete
their enegy review BEFORE CoRWM had reported - the committees failure
to find a 'solution' to the dangerous problem of nuclear waste, with
only exorbitantly expensive 'management' proposals to offer, would
have silenced many of the advocates of a new generation of dirty,
dangerous and uneconomic power stations. (2)

"CorRWM have not provided a solution, because there are none that
provide any certainty of safety and containment. The committee's
findings will be seized as a way forward by the nuclear lobby, when
the only guaranteed things they offer is continuing liability and risk.

"For the future, the best way of dealing with nuclear waste is not to
create it in the first place."


The key elements of the recommendations are:

- In the long term, disposal of radioactive waste deep underground,
an option known as geological disposal.
- Robust interim storage, in recognition of the fact that the process
leading to the creation of suitable facilities for disposal may take
several decade
- An equal partnership between government and potential host
communities based on a willingness to participate
- The immediate creation of an oversight body to begin the process of
implementation






..
.: :.